| |
A Googleless Usenet?
NewsAdmin Staff Writer
It's
a beautiful day. The sunny is shining, the birds are
singing, and the world is at your fingertips... chips, dip,
bbq, beverages & remote. You locate the sweet spot on your
sofa, and as your posterior greets the well worn cushion,
you settle yourself in front of the TV for a weekend of
playoff football. Howie Long is 30 seconds into his rambling
predictions for the Cardinals/Falcons game when you
begrudgingly pry yourself from the sofa to answer an
unexpected knock at your front door.
You twist the knob, swing the door open, and find a stranger
on your front porch announcing a limited supply of Nike
sneakers and Gucci handbags that could be yours at a steep
discount. You ponder the unusual product pairing for a
moment, cut the conversation short with a quick "Thanks, but
no thanks", and close the door.
Halfway to the sofa you hear a persistent tapping and turn
to see the same stranger in front of your window yelling
about a once in a lifetime opportunity to purchase Viagra at
wholesale prices. Disappearing for a moment, he quickly
reemerges in front of a different window promising to lower
the interest rate on your home loan and add 3" to a specific
part of your anatomy. Law enforcement arrives to arrest the
annoying pest, but not before he's disrupted your afternoon
& delivered a final plug for 1/2 price Rolex watches as he's
being stuffed into a squad car.
You may find that a similar scenario plays out as you try to
avoid unsolicited advertisements that have found their way
into your favorite newsgroups. Usenet enthusiasts do not
have the option of having spammers handcuffed & jailed...
though it is a pleasing image to process... but you may want
to consider some of the following options for minimizing
your exposure to newsgroup spam.
When
selecting a newsgroup service provider (NSP), take a
moment to find out what precautions (if any) they take to
reduce spam postings on their news servers. At a minimum, a
quality NSP should have an abuse or support staff that
addresses spam complaints in a timely fashion. Reputable
NSPs understand that spam is disruptive to newsgroup users &
wastefully consumes resources (storage, bandwidth, etc.), so
they're usually quick to remove spam once it's been
reported. If you're using a NSP that doesn't respond to
email sent to their "abuse@" address, or if they're
unwilling to remove spam once it's been reported, you may be
better off with a provider that operates their Usenet
service more responsibly.
Nowadays many premium providers run some type of spam
filtering logic on their news servers. The arrangement
allows valid posts to reach the newsgroups, but blocks
unwanted spam posts on the front end before they have an
opportunity to disrupt the groups. In fact some NSPs report
that they block upwards of 1/2 million spam postings per
day! Each provider ultimately uses a different filtering
scheme... some more effective than others... so this may be
a point of comparison to consider when test driving various
NSPs. We've evaluated a number of 2nd & 3rd tier providers
over the years that promote themselves as "unfiltered" or
"uncensored" services, and more often than not this simply
means that their news servers are overrun with spam and
provide less in the way of relevant newsgroup content.
As a newsgroup user you also have some control over your
destiny. Most NNTP newsreaders include a "kill filter" area
where you can establish rules for filtering content within
the newsgroups you frequent. Depending upon the newsreader,
you should have the ability to filter on a variety of
posting details (From, Subject, NNTP Posting Host, etc.),
and we'd recommend choosing a reader that provides flexible
filtering options. For those who prefer to use a Web
interface to access the newsgroups, select a NSP that
incorporates some type of kill filtering within their Web
reader.
If you find yourself dealing with a persistent spammer in
the newsgroups, rally your fellow newsgroup compatriots and
send a complaint to the news server from which the spammer
posts. When viewing the header information for a post, the
originating server will typically be noted within the "NNTP
Posting Host" header. More often than not, you can contact
the server administrators via email by appending "abuse@" to
the server's domain name (example: abuse@newsguy.com,
abuse@giganews.com, etc.) Most news server admins are
responsive to spam complaints, and will simply require a
single example header from an offending spam post to address
the problem on their end.
In rare instances you'll find some news servers that are run
carelessly and without much regard to Usenet guidelines.
Google for example provides free newsgroup access through
their website, and they have a poor reputation when it comes
to preventing spammers from abusing their news servers. If
the problem only impacted Google's free newsgroup users it
wouldn't be a great concern, unfortunately Google propagates
their spam to other NSPs where people are paying for their
newsgroup access. If the majority of the content being
distributed by a provider is spam, and a provider shows no
interest in correcting that problem, other NSPs may consider
suspending content exchanges (peering) with those spam
sources. Providers such as Google would be forced to operate
their service more responsibly, and there would be less spam
circulated throughout Usenet, which would benefit both NSPs
and newsgroup users alike. A Googleless Usenet may be an
extreme notion to some, but if the majority of their content
is spam, what value are they bringing to Usenet & newsgroup
users?
Return to the main
"News & Commentary" index |
|